Truck Parking Data for State Freight Plan Updates

Federal Law Requires It. We Supply It.

49 U.S.C. § 70202: every State Freight Plan must include a commercial motor vehicle parking assessment.

Why it matters: The assessment is mandatory — but a facility list alone won’t survive review. You need supply, demand, and shortage evidence.

4 questions a static inventory can’t answer

  • ? Is the inventory current and accurate?
  • ? Where and when does parking fill up?
  • ? Where do shortages repeat?
  • ? How fast will demand grow here?
Undesignated Truck Parking Location and Risk Map showing unmet demand and interstate corridors
Undesignated Truck Parking Location & Risk Map

We map the shortage — and the way out.

The § 70202 assessment shows where parking is short. The harder question: where can new capacity actually go? Expanding at a known hotspot is usually blocked.

  • No revenue model. The federal ban on commercializing Interstate rest areas leaves nothing to fund M&O.
  • Costly land. Right-of-way near saturated corridors is the most expensive in the study area.
  • Local opposition. The closer a site sits to development, the harder the fight.

Our demand model estimates demand independently of existing supply — so it also finds candidate zones: grids with expected demand and no facility today. Texas has 609. Illinois has 220. Intersect them with your ROW inventory or surplus-property list, and you have a parcel-level shortlist.

What you get

1

Verified inventory

Current, geolocated public and private facilities, organized for planning use.

2

Availability data

Observed patterns showing where and when supply runs out.

3

Shortage analysis

Corridor and facility-level pinpointing of recurring parking pressure.

4

Demand forecasting

Future demand estimates — including candidate zones with demand but no facility.

5

GIS-ready maps and tables

Structured outputs for maps, summaries, and internal review.

6

Methodology notes

Sources, assumptions, and processing steps — documented for technical review.

Static list vs. planning data

Focus Static inventory Trucking Lab
Facility data Names and addresses, unverified. Geolocated, structured, planning-ready.
Availability Can’t show when parking fills. Shows where and when supply runs out.
Shortages Can’t explain recurring pressure. Pinpoints recurring shortage locations.
Future demand Needs separate analysis. Forecast built in, with candidate zones.
Planning output More GIS work on your end. GIS-ready maps, tables, methodology notes.

5 steps into your Freight Plan

1

Update the inventory

Replace stale records with verified, geocoded facilities.

2

Review availability

See where and when supply becomes limited.

3

Locate shortages

Flag locations with recurring parking pressure.

4

Forecast demand

Ground the future-needs discussion in modeled estimates.

5

Drop in the outputs

GIS-ready maps, tables, and methodology notes go straight into the plan.

Common questions from State DOT teams

What does § 70202 actually require?

Every State Freight Plan must include the most recent commercial motor vehicle parking facilities assessment conducted by the State.

What data supports the assessment?

Facility locations, capacity, availability patterns, shortage locations, and demand forecasts.

Why isn’t a static inventory enough?

It shows where facilities are. It can’t show when they fill, where pressure repeats, or how demand will change.

Can the data find new candidate locations — not just document shortages?

Yes. Demand is modeled independently of supply, so the analysis surfaces candidate zones: areas with expected demand and no facility today. That’s where overflow can go when hotspot expansion is blocked by ROW cost, M&O burden, or local opposition.

Can the analysis be customized?

Yes — statewide, corridor, regional, or facility level.

Updating a State Freight Plan?

Tell us the state and timeline. We’ll show you what the assessment package looks like.

Contact Us